Hlophe case summary. Hlophe to the JSC as Administrative Action (AA) under .

Hlophe case summary. Hlophe was accused of improper interference in the deliberations of the Constitutional Court in litigation involving the interests of Jacob Zuma. May 5, 2022 · [1] This is a review application brought by Hlophe JP to set aside the decision of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), taken on 25 August 2021, in which it resolved, by a majority of 8-4, that he had committed gross misconduct. Mar 1, 2024 · Former Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe broke trust with the judiciary and the public. 8 KB) Sep 27, 2024 · The DA and Corruption Watch had sought an urgent court order to prevent impeached judge John Hlophe from participating in sittings of the Judicial Service Commission. Oct 11, 2024 · The interim interdict prevents Dr Hlophe – now a Member of Parliament (“MP”) for the MK Party – from participating in the Judicial Service Commission (“JSC”). Now that the JSC has finally determined that he is guilty of gross misconduct, Judge Hlophe is seeking to have that decision set aside and for the National Assembly to be interdicted from proceeding with the impeachment process. Hlophe, an MP for the uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK) Party, from participating in the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) processes. His impeachment was the result of a finding by the Judicial Service Commission that his conduct in this regard amounted to gross misconduct. ‘His impeachment sets an example to other members of the judiciary who may feel tempted to abuse their power,’ says the HSRC’s Professor Narnia Bohler-Muller, a constitutional law expert. Hlophe, on the other hand, displayed a wilful and unashamed effort to improperly influence the outcome of a case. Hlophe to the JSC as Administrative Action (AA) under Hlophe v Freedom Under Law In re: Freedom Under Law v Hlophe; Moseneke and Others v Hlophe In re: Hlophe v Judicial Services Commission and Others (2021/43482) [2021] ZAGPJHC 743; [2022] 1 All SA 721 (GJ); 2022 (2) SA 523 (GJ) (29 November 2021) Download original files PDF format RTF format REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG). This case note will look at the facts, issues and the applicable law the Court referred to. Sep 27, 2024 · Pending the determination of the merits of the Applicant's review of the National Assembly's decision to designate the First Respondent (Dr Hlophe) as its representative to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), either in Part B of this application, or by the Constitutional Court in Case CCT 253/24 and/or in Case CCT 222/24, whichever occurs Mar 30, 2012 · See Judge President Hlophe v Premier of the Western Cape Province; Judge President Hlophe v Freedom under Law and Others (Centre for Applied Legal Studies and Others as Amici Curiae) [2011] ZACC 29; 2012 (1) BCLR 1 (CC) (Hlophe), where the developments and changes in the composition of this Court since the applications were lodged are explained Apr 11, 2024 · In Motata’s case, his flagrant dishonesty and lack of accountability, even when afforded an opportunity to truthfully account for his fault lines fell afoul of the integrity injunction the Code of Judicial Conduct imposes on Judges. Jun 12, 2008 · Citation Mahlalela v Hlophe No And Others (88 of 2008) [2008] SZIC 119 (12 June 2008) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2008] SZIC 119 Copy Court Industrial Court of eSwatini Case number 88 of 2008 Judgment date 12 June 2008 Language English Court Roll Download PDF (43. Mar 31, 2009 · The majority (Mojapelo DJP with Moshidi and Mathopo JJ concurring) upheld the respondent’s claim for declaratory orders in part (Hlophe v Constitutional Court of South Africa and Others (08/22932) [2008] ZAGPHC 289, [2009] 2 All SA 72 (W)). Sep 27, 2024 · The High Court issued its judgment on the DA’s urgent application to interdict Hlophe from taking up a seat on the JSC, this after the party filed papers against his designation to the JSC in July. 'This ruling is a major step Oct 11, 2024 · In this post, Art Wynberg and Daniel Robert Erasmus unpack the Democratic Alliance v Hlophe case, where the Court interdicted Dr. They critique the Court's classification of the National Assembly's designation of Dr. h6ki 9qc gaqo1a rv4mm mck buens az 18p2xp x854 snce